Roger Lindsay participated in the essay-marking study purporting to demonstrate that academic assessment is a "lottery" (News, THES , June 28). He says the essays contained no coherent theory and little he would regard as evidence. This left little more than students' style to comment on.
In other words, Lindsay was marking almost wholly on style, not substance. It is therefore difficult to see why he contributed to the conclusions of such a flawed study and, if his experience is at all typical, what validity it can claim.
Nigel Probert
Porthmadog
请先注册再继续
为何要注册？
- 注册是免费的，而且十分便捷
- 注册成功后，您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
- 订阅我们的邮件
已经注册或者是已订阅？
Please or to read this article.