While I applaud the sentiments expressed at The Value of Arts and Humanities in the 21st Century forum ("More than just a Book at Bedtime", 12 May), I would add that the evidence for the value of an education in the humanities for undergraduates, even measured in the most prosaically utilitarian terms, is mounting.
In the US, the Collegiate Learning Assessment, a standardised test focusing on critical thinking, complex reasoning and literacy, has consistently demonstrated that humanities and social science students beat their contemporaries in business, education, social work, engineering, computer science, communications and health studies.
While subsequent patterns of employment suggest that many humanities graduates pursue "non-graduate" (as traditionally defined) occupations, this often reflects other factors, such as the relatively high proportion of mature graduates in the humanities with strong ties to particular localities and, consequently, access to limited job markets, rather than any intrinsic lack of "utility" in the disciplines studied.
Gervase Phillips, Principal lecturer in history, Manchester Metropolitan University
请先注册再继续
为何要注册?
- 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
- 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
- 订阅我们的邮件
已经注册或者是已订阅?