It has been known for many years that Nobel prize-winners have a higher citation count than those who do not win a prize, and this fact has been used from time to time to predict future winners.
Raymond Damadian's claim ("Overlooked Nobel advertises his plight", THES , December 12) that he un-fairly missed out on the Nobel prize for physiology or medicine is not supported by his citation count, which although a respectable 1,828, is less than half the citation count of the winner, Paul Lauterbur, who has 4,415.
Charles Oppenheim
Department of information science
Loughborough University
请先注册再继续
为何要注册?
- 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
- 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
- 订阅我们的邮件
已经注册或者是已订阅?
Please or to read this article.