Should it be surprising that students who do well answering unseen IQ questions, under time pressure in a single session, prefer to answer exam papers on the same model?
Equally, it seems sensible for students who do less well to prefer to take time to answer questions and to opt for, say, 5,000-15,000 words. And, if we teachers do not offer adequate supervision for such major enterprises in our courses, is this not our fault, not the method's?
More generally, employers - and apparently some dons - should be warned that an ability to answer abstract questions, avoiding in principle any reference to scientific, historical or other cultural issues, does not guarantee similar success with tricky issues in academic studies - not to mention everyday life.
John Dixon
Ilkley
请先注册再继续
为何要注册?
- 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
- 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
- 订阅我们的邮件
已经注册或者是已订阅?