I wonder if your readers can help me with an ethical dilemma? I have been asked to referee an article that cites ten of my papers, but that (in my professional opinion) does not merit publication.
In view of the promised use of metrics in determining the future funding of my department, should I (a) put my institution first and accept the paper, (b) put my subject first and reject it, or (c) claim a conflict of interest and decline to act as referee?
Robert A. Wilson,
Professor of pure mathematics,
Queen Mary, University of London
请先注册再继续
为何要注册?
- 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
- 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
- 订阅我们的邮件
已经注册或者是已订阅?
Please or to read this article.