Even though both reviewer and author happen to be professional astronomers, it is surprising that Owen Gingerich ("Born under a wandering star", THES, October 22) seems unaware that few, if any, New Testament scholars accept the Star of Bethlehem narrative as historical. Recorded as it is in one gospel only (Matthew's), it is usually regarded as yet another of the writer's attempts to fulfil a particular prediction, in this case Numbers xxiv:17, by means of invented narrative.
As Gibbon sarcastically (but correctly) observed 200 years ago, it is inconceivable that an "event" such as this would have gone unnoticed by contemporary Roman or Jewish historians; and equally inconceivable that such corroboration, had it been forthcoming, would not have been made the most of by later Christian apologists.
Brian Thomas
Bentley, Surrey
请先注册再继续
为何要注册?
- 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
- 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
- 订阅我们的邮件
已经注册或者是已订阅?