网曝门

Less than half of academics happy with work-life balance

<网曝门 class="standfirst">Satisfaction with pay and benefits lags well behind other sectors but career development improving, survey finds
六月 4, 2025
Source: iStock/Bilanol

Less than half of academics feel they can “comfortably manage” their workloads while satisfaction with benefits packages?sits well below other sectors, according to a major survey.

Some 240,000 employees across more than 75 UK higher education institutions were polled on their attitudes to work and careers, revealing continued disparities between academic and professional services jobs.

In comparison with the 43 per cent of academics who are happy with their workload, 63 per cent of professional services staff say the same, the survey, conducted by consultancy People Insight and the Universities and Colleges Employers Association (Ucea) finds.

Academic staff also had less favourable views on their well-being and work-life balance, with only 48 per cent of academic staff saying they feel they can strike the right balance between work and home life and 44 per cent saying they felt their university supported them adequately with their health and well-being at work.

The percentage is higher among professional services staff, at 61 per cent, but both were still below the average when compared with other sectors.

The survey further finds that satisfaction with total benefits among academic staff is just 38 per cent, well below averages?in other sectors.

And hybrid working – which increased massively during the pandemic – has had both positive and negative effects.

While “camaraderie within teams” and a sense of community at work has significantly improved, there was a decline in the perception that different parts of the sector work well together.

“Hybrid working arrangements, which are likely to vary across different departments, may be contributing to this issue, as conflicting schedules reduce opportunities for face-to-face interaction – essential for effective cross-departmental collaboration,” the report says.

But while there was no change in perceptions of work-life balance among academic staff since a similar survey was conducted in 2021, professional services staff report an improvement of three percentage points, which the report attributed to “the flexibility that allows many to work from home part of the week instead of being on campus every day”.


Campus collection: Well-being in higher education

Also on the positive side, there has been “significant progress” in meeting employees’ career development aspirations, increasing from 39 per cent to 46 per cent.

“While there have been notable improvements in certain areas over the last few years, such as career development and work satisfaction, further targeted efforts are needed to ensure a more equitable and supportive working environment for all,” the report concludes.

Writing in the foreword, Ken Sloan, a board member at Ucea and vice-chancellor of Harper Adams University, says the “current challenges facing our sector only emphasise the importance of keeping [employee experience] at the heart of any employment provision and change”.

tom.williams@timeshighereducation.com

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
Please
or
to read this article.
<网曝门 class="pane-title"> 相关文章
<网曝门 class="pane-title"> Reader's comments (4)
new
"The survey further finds that satisfaction with total benefits among academic staff is just 38 per cent, well below averages in other sectors" what a surprise, given the constant erosion of the real value of pay over the last decade or so. Will UCEA now acknowledge this is an issue, and commit to a medium term plan for addressing it? No-one – perhaps except for the most militant - expects that it can be sorted overnight, but surely a realistic medium term path to restoring some level of real-terms pay is not beyond the sector’s capabilities? And – given UCEA themselves have commissioned this - will a journalist ask UCEA the above questions?
new
Or perhaps not, as having read the report, the recommendation is to "Communicate total rewards continuously: Regularly remind staff of the full range of benefits and rewards available to them, ensuring transparency and understanding of the value offered" which comes across as rather patronising when every member of staff knows how much real-pay has been squeezed. Surely UCEA don't think this enough in the face of such degredation of real-pay? Another thing for THE journalists to add to their list of questions for UCEA if they fancy holding them to account anytime.
new
Please tell us WHEN, if ever, "academics were pleased with work-life balance"? We never were and will unlikely ever well be. That, in part, is the nature of the contradictions of academic life. The so-called "promise of intangible rewards" [sic]
new
I agree, when have academics ever been happy with anything and there's a lot of whinging here. For example, a mate of mine does about four hours a week teaching, reduced load because of an admin post (which is easy). he's published next to nothin g over the years, the very basic minimum compliance, but is up for his research leave again and won't be teaching until January. There's an awful lot of people like him in the system and, if we were being honest (which we seldom are), we all know plenty. It's no good banging on about how we all work over 70 hours a week etc, no-one believes us or even cares. They look at the number of teaching hours and teaching weeks we work and tend to think we are rather doing very little. Yes, I do know some colleagues who are driven and work every hour they can and are very productive in research terms and good teachers, but they are not the majority in my experience by any account.
ADVERTISEMENT