The battle is raging over whether competition is a good way to drive up quality in the sector. If we accept Lord Browne's (and presumably the government's) view that it is, why exclude science, technology, engineering and mathematics subjects from the wonderful effects of proper competition? Surely we should be applying the most effective techniques to our highest priorities?
Could it be because Browne et al do not believe it themselves?
Bob Walder, London.
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 罢贬贰’蝉 university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?
Please or to read this article.