Relying on international student tuition fees has provided authoritarian countries such as China with a ¡°powerful lever¡± to use against US universities, an academic has warned.

With the US having long depended on overseas students, the Trump administration is making the issue worse, according to Sarah McLaughlin, a senior scholar on global expression at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (Fire).?

¡°With all these funding cuts, it is going to force universities to have to look elsewhere for funding¡­and I don¡¯t think it¡¯s a grand mystery [that] they might consider looking to expand ties to improve funding,¡± she told Times Higher Education.

,?McLaughlin examines how foreign authoritarian influence is undermining freedom and integrity within US universities, including focusing on the ¡°borderless censorship¡± of countries like China, which has been accused of pressuring students from afar.

ÍøÆØÃÅ

McLaughlin said Beijing was increasingly relying on emotional arguments about universities¡¯ responsibility to avoid offending China as a way of shutting down discussions around the sovereignty of Hong Kong or Taiwan.

The book warns that colleges are recruiting international students without worrying about their ¡°basic expressive rights¡±.

ÍøÆØÃÅ

¡°The unfortunate thing about international students here in the US is that the more universities want and need them to fill up space in the university to provide much needed tuition dollars, the greater incentive there is for them to ignore those students¡¯ rights and concerns,¡± said McLaughlin.

¡°If you really need that funding source, you might not want to engage in any activity that¡¯s going to threaten it.¡±

As a result, China and other well-populated authoritarian countries have a ¡°powerful lever¡­to pull against noncompliant universities¡± ¨C the power to deny universities millions of dollars in tuition payments.

¡°When you put together the presence of international students, the funding, the relationships, the ties on the whole, those countries have gained more than the US has, but that¡¯s only because universities have allowed this issue to go unchallenged,¡± said McLaughlin.

¡°I want international students to continue to be a major force in American higher education but not without real understanding of the specific, free speech issues and cultural concerns that come with those students.¡±

The book compares higher education to Hollywood ¨C both industries that once thought they had the power to liberalise China, which have now become dependent on and changed by participation in the Chinese market.

¡°Outside of maybe providing VPN access, I don¡¯t think American universities have brought any new kinds of freedoms within China, but I do think they have brought in really worrying incentives into their own operations to maintain those partnerships,¡± McLaughlin continued.?

ÍøÆØÃÅ

¡°At its core, I think they have prioritised the reputation of being a global institution and the money that comes with it more than anything else.¡±

ÍøÆØÃÅ

While China is the ¡°lead story¡± when it comes to censorship from abroad, McLaughlin said universities were also guilty of expanding into the Gulf states without understanding the pressures this will put on their values.

¡°It¡¯s the same kind of thing that we¡¯ve seen with FIFA, with the Olympics. It¡¯s pretty basic stuff: whenever you have a global industry that chooses to expand, it¡¯s going to face these pressures and it¡¯s just a greater concern when the one doing that is higher education.¡±

Though later pardoned, Matthew Hedges, a British researcher, was?tortured in prison in the United Arab Emirates (UAE)?after being accused of spying for the UK government. McLaughlin warns that higher education¡¯s ¡°business as usual¡± expansion into the UAE is the fastest way of normalising abuse such as this.

¡°[Gulf states] are trying to entice these global institutions that are highly respected to their country because of the patina of respectability that it gives.

¡°If universities think that what they¡¯re doing there is worth perhaps giving that PR hit to those countries then so be it.¡±

While there is no ¡°silver bullet¡± to fix the problems, McLaughlin said all institutions should offer all international students explainers on what their rights are, anonymous reporting lines on transnational repression and ensure their overseas partnerships are not ¡°rubber stamping¡± rights violations.

And if US higher education survives its own domestic problems, she said this creates an opportunity for universities to ¡°reimagine¡± how they deal with authoritarian censorship abroad.

¡°I don¡¯t want them to do the right thing and fight back against the Trump administration just to allow similar threats from foreign governments to go unchallenged.

ÍøÆØÃÅ

¡°I hope that this can be taken as an opportunity for universities to really reject authoritarianism from every source.¡±

patrick.jack@timeshighereducation.com