ÍøÆØÃÅ

Teaching students overseas ¡®more vital than ever¡¯, says DMU v-c

<ÍøÆØÃÅ class="standfirst">Ability to run courses and research in Leicester relies on income from international operations, leader warns after criticism of expansion plans
June 30, 2025
Katie Normington
Katie Normington

Scaling back the teaching of students in overseas campuses in response to domestic financial pressures would be a mistake for UK universities given the immense economic and educational benefits derived from transnational education, the vice-chancellor of De Montfort University (DMU) has argued.

After facing criticism from staff for expanding abroad while cutting back at home, Katie Normington told Times Higher Education that it was now more important than ever for her institution to operate globally.

DMU has campuses in Dubai, Cambodia and Kazakhstan in addition to its UK base in Leicester, with more than 12,000 students learning overseas once those taught through franchise and other agreements are included.

Income gained from overseas ventures is increasingly needed to support loss-making teaching and research activity in the UK, said Normington. ¡°Like other UK universities, we are in a position where home student fees do not cover the costs of teaching and that fee is unlikely to rise much further in coming years,¡± she said.

ÍøÆØÃÅ

ADVERTISEMENT

Domestic fees are set to?increase to ?9,535 a year?from September after a long freeze, but Universities UK analysis suggests this is still about ?3,000?short of the true cost?of educating undergraduates.

¡°International student numbers in the UK are also more volatile than ever¡­so if you want to support the range and breadth of what we do here then you need to think about how we do this,¡± Normington added.

ÍøÆØÃÅ

ADVERTISEMENT

¡°Some universities can generate large commercial revenues from other activities such as conferencing, halls of residence or hotels [they own] ¨C post-1992 universities don¡¯t tend to have these facilities as we largely serve local students, but [at DMU] we do have a track record of success in transnational education lasting 30 years.¡±

Without the surplus generated from international activity, DMU would need to consider ¡°cutting programmes with very low enrolments, affecting local students who would not have access to other opportunities, or thinking about how we support our seven research institutes¡±, said Normington.

The university is currently seeking to?save about ?8 million?which, according to an internal consultation, ¡°could result in up to 80 roles being made redundant¡± despite having already found some ?17 million of savings in 2024-25.

Education group Study World has also accused DMU of an?¡°unlawful¡± termination of a partnership?in April 2024 which had seen it build and operate a previous Dubai campus ¨C demonstrating some of the potential risks in developing such activity.

ÍøÆØÃÅ

ADVERTISEMENT

Study World¡¯s claims have been rejected as baseless by DMU, which insists that the deal, agreed under UK law, was terminated following multiple warnings over breaches ¨C a scenario covered by the agreement. There is also a ¡°firewall¡± in institutional spending to ensure investment in Dubai is funded by cash reserves, rather than efficiency savings in Leicester.

With DMU¡¯s overseas student numbers likely to overtake home-educated students ¡°within a few years¡±, the financial return from this activity was vitally important, but transnational education also aligned strongly with DMU¡¯s historic educational mission of widening student access, said Normington.

¡°We are seeing huge growth in our global numbers, partly because we are operating in emerging economies who want the education that De Montfort offers. But we¡¯re also taking it to audiences who could not benefit from it previously ¨C there are, for instance, a very high proportion of women students on many of our campuses, and we¡¯re also reaching out to those students whose families aren¡¯t wealthy enough to send them to an international university,¡± she said.

Addressing internal criticism over its Dubai expansion, Normington added: ¡°I can see it is difficult for people to understand why we are advertising for jobs in Dubai while we are restructuring. But our cash reserves ¨C which are healthy ¨C allow us to do this.¡±

ÍøÆØÃÅ

ADVERTISEMENT

¡°When you start modelling the financial sustainability of UK universities [under current conditions] they are becoming less and less sustainable ¨C either you accept that or think about what can be done differently,¡± she added.

jack.grove@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.
<ÍøÆØÃÅ class="pane-title"> Related articles
<ÍøÆØÃÅ class="pane-title"> Related universities
<ÍøÆØÃÅ class="pane-title"> Reader's comments (18)
What upsets me as a student from a poor family is that my De Montfort fees in Leicester are paying for a campus in Dubai that has state of the art facilities (brand new auditoriums and libraries) while library databases are being cut in Leicester and there has been a reduction of 80 percent of proper professors in some schools in Leicester since 2021. Why am I paying ?9500 per year to be taught by second rate staff who have no master's degree or PhD and have no research or peer reviewed publications to fund Dubai? We pay Russell Group fees to get taught by non-academics. UK universities servicing the poor in regional cities need to get back and focus on their charitable obligations iin the UK and stop spending ?8000 per trip in business class to Dubai on jollies. Why are we paying for a provost in Dubai and his car and house?
De Montfort's annual report states that 87 percent of all its income comes from UK student fees so the cash reserves used to give rich Dubai students a 700 seat auditorium and world class shiny library facilities is coming from increasing profits at the expense of UK students as the cash reserve is student money. They moved the Dubai campus in 2024 to another part of that territory from its original location in 2021 at a huge cost to Leicester students¡ªall while cutting the library facilities and staff at De Monfort Leicester to the bone. Staff get no allowance to go to any academic conference, now hot desk and have to supply their own computer unless they want to use out-of-date Dells from the 2000s.
Everyone commenting on this story is aware of the Defamation Act 2013 and will only state facts, so hopefully this time the Vice Chancellor's office will not write to the THE and demand comments be removed that are the truth. ?43 million of UK fees to fund a start up in Dubai that is still losing ?6 million per year nearly half a decade later with London losing ?3 million per year. This is the worst financial management in a UK university I have ever seen and I have been working full time since the mid 1980s.
Yes removing comments from stories in news with threats is anti free speech and OfS slammed Southampton Uni for such conduct.
Kazakhstan continues to face significant and persistent human rights abuses, with multiple independent organizations and international bodies documenting a troubling pattern of violations. Dubai, as part of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), is subject to widespread and systematic human rights abuses documented by international organizations and independent observers. It is problematic for a UK university to do business with a Dubai partner registered in a tax haven such as the British Virgin Islands (BVI) for several interrelated ethical, legal, and reputational reasons: 1. Lack of Transparency and Accountability Tax havens like the BVI are characterized by secrecy and a lack of effective information exchange. Companies registered there are often not required to disclose beneficial ownership or financial activities, making it difficult to trace who truly controls the entity and where the money flows . This opacity increases the risk of the university inadvertently facilitating or being associated with money laundering, tax evasion, or other illicit financial activities . 2. Undermining Tax Justice and Public Trust Tax havens enable corporate tax abuse and significant global tax losses. The use of such jurisdictions is a key factor in countries losing hundreds of billions in tax revenue annually, undermining public services and social trust . When a public institution like a UK university partners with entities in tax havens, it can be seen as complicit in these practices, contradicting the university¡¯s role as a socially responsible and ethical actor.
TNE is resource-intensive and can be expensive to set up and manage, with significant regulatory and quality assurance challenges. The financial returns have been shown over and over to be a mirage.
DMU does not have a great track record with its leadership and board of governors. The fact that the current chair of the board of governors has chosen to ignore votes of no confidence in the leadership by the university professoriate and the DMU UCU branch membership, and instead send an email to all staff telling them to wind their necks in, suggests that the problem of poor governance persists.
Kazakhstan students are not taught by academics and it is an independent company running operations there and they pay DMU about ?1 per head meaning there is zero profit in it. Dubai is losing ?16 million every year nearly half a decade later resulting in DMU having to sack 100s of staff and work the remaining staff 90 hour weeks to cover the increased work to cover the loss out there. It is "Voodoo economics". "The idea that a failing campus will somehow turn a profit is pure pipe dream ¡ª a kind of voodoo economics dressed up as strategic planning." Or more bluntly: "Believing this campus will make money one day is a fantasy rooted in denial, not data ¡ª classic voodoo economics." That aside, no jobs ought to be cut to reduce the educational experience in the UK for UK students to fund the Dubai pipe dream. The students at Liecester are being ripped off as they are getting a budget deal but paying the full price. They are going to barely see a professor soon and they will have noting but staff educated to the bachelor's degree level teaching them. It is a disgrace. Libraries are being closed and assets sold off like there is no tomorrow at DMU. There ought to be a proportionate number of professors, readers, senior lecturers in each school with a sprinkling of bachelor educated practitioners to help with costs. Staff used to have their own office but now mainly hot desk and the place is falling apart. Yet the VC is on 400k and living in London rather than deprived Leicester.
If it so profitable then stop cutting costs at Leicester and use cash reserves until the big money flows in.
An unanimous no-confidence vote from the professoriate, a 90% no-confidence vote from UCU (University and College Union), and an open letter from hundreds of students demanding resignation ¨C creates an extremely precarious and likely untenable position for a Vice-Chancellor (VC) in a UK university. The professoriate not only voted no confidence in Vice Chancellor Katie Normington, but also told her to consider her position and resign. Normington has no loss or authority to lead but the BoG is not taking action as was the case with Dominic Shellard until it was too late and the University suffered massive reputational damage. The VC has lost the confidence of virtually every key stakeholder group within the university: academic staff, unionized staff, and students. This fundamentally undermines her legitimacy and ability to lead effectively. Without the trust and cooperation of these groups, it becomes incredibly difficult to implement policies, manage operations, and maintain a functional university environment. SThe call for the VC to "consider her position" from the professoriate is a strong indication that internal pressure for resignation is already very high. The public nature of these votes and letters have caused significant reputational damage to both the VC personally and the university itself. It no doubt is deterring prospective students and staff, damageing relationships with funding bodies and external partners, due to the negative media attention. The governing body (Council/Board) of the university is under severe pressure to act. While they hold the ultimate power to appoint and dismiss a VC, they cannot ignore such a widespread and strong expression of no confidence. Their continued support for a VC in this situation could lead to accusations of poor governance and further damage the institution's standing. They should now be rethinking their initial support and be reviewing the situation very closely, and exploring options. If the VC does not resign, the situation will escalate. It is almost certain industrial action will be timed to hit new students arriving in the new academic year if the VC does not resign. The UCU's strong vote indicates a high likelihood of industrial action (strikes, boycotts, etc.), which would further disrupt university operations. Continued student dissatisfaction could lead to further protests and activism. External bodies, such as the Office for Students (OfS), and Information Commissioner are already investigating the matter and hopefully will act soon. The government might start to take an interest if the situation is seen to be impacting the university's ability to fulfill its charitable objects or maintain standards. The combination of unanimous and overwhelming no-confidence votes from key internal groups (professoriate, UCU) and widespread student demand for resignation indicates that the Vice-Chancellor's position is highly precarious and unsustainable. It is almost certainly a matter of when, not if, she will have to step down or be removed by the governing body. The pressure will be immense for the governing body to take decisive action to restore stability and confidence within the university.
Recent and Notable Cases (last few years) of Vice Chancellors doing the right thing after being forced to do so: Professor Wendy Thomson (University of London): Suspended in May 2025 following allegations of bullying and poor leadership, as well as a "culture of bullying and fear" reported by staff. While suspended, the outcome is pending. George Holmes (University of Bolton / University of Greater Manchester): Suspended in May 2025 due to "serious allegations" related to financial irregularities, including a probe into attempts to divert tuition fees into a private company owned by an executive. Professor Iain Gillespie (University of Dundee): Resigned in December 2024 after the university faced a significant financial deficit (?35 million) and a report criticized poor financial judgment, inadequate management, and lack of agility by leadership. He has also been questioned about a ?150,000 payoff. James Purnell (University of the Arts London - UAL): Stepped down in June 2024 (effective September) after months of student protests against the university's stance on the war in Gaza and demands for his resignation. While the university stated he was moving to a new role, the timing strongly suggests pressure. Dame Glynis Breakwell (University of Bath): Resigned in 2017 amidst significant controversy over her high salary (reportedly ?468,000), benefits, and the university's governance. There was widespread criticism from staff, students, and unions, and she narrowly survived a no-confidence vote from the university's senate. Her departure terms, including a large "golden handshake" and a car loan write-off, also drew heavy criticism. Professor Malcolm Press (Manchester Metropolitan University): In October 2020, UCU members at MMU passed a motion calling for his immediate resignation due to his handling of the Covid-19 crisis, including locking down students in halls. While he did not immediately resign, this illustrates significant pressure. (Note: He is still listed as VC there, so the pressure didn't lead to immediate resignation in this specific case, but it was a notable public call). Professor Nancy Rothwell (University of Manchester): Faced calls for her resignation and a non-binding vote of no confidence (which passed with 89% in 2021) from student activists ("Nancy Out" campaign) over the university's handling of the Covid-19 pandemic, particularly the erection of fences around student accommodation. She eventually announced her retirement for 2024, planned for some time, so it's not a direct "forced" resignation but certainly came after public pressure. Julius Weinberg (Kingston University): Resigned in 2016, citing "differing views" on the future of the university between himself and the board of governors. This often indicates disagreements that lead to a forced departure. General Reasons for Forced Resignation/Suspension: Vice-Chancellors in the UK are typically forced to resign due to: Loss of Confidence: As per your initial scenario, widespread no-confidence votes from staff (especially UCU) and students are very powerful indicators that a VC's position has become untenable. Financial Mismanagement: Significant deficits, questionable investments, or allegations of improper financial dealings. Poor Leadership/Governance: Accusations of bullying, lack of transparency, authoritarian management style, or failure to consult with staff and students. Breaches of confidentiality involving Information Commission.
James Purnell (University of the Arts London - UAL): Stepped down in June 2024 (effective September) after months of student protests against the university's stance on the war in Gaza and demands for his resignation. Hmmmm. Maybe he did the wrong thing?
She recently admitted that Dubai is losing ?6 every year in letter to staff in UK so I think she means ¡°teching in Dubai is totally tolerant on Leicester¡±!
That is her subjective opinion, but the objective opinion of all the professors at DMU is the opposite.
Gosh, how is Dubai losing ?6 million last year contributing to the ?12.6 million surplus at DMU last year. Maths and economics and business are clearly not Normingtons strong points. Would not that surplus have been ?18.6 million without the Dubai losses?
It beggar¡¯s belief that someone so bad at reading the room has managed to chance their way into a vice chancellorship. This VC refuses to accept that her continuation in the role is doing untold damage. Whoever takes over as interim VC ought to reflect hard on why Normington had to resign.
More red herrings to try to distract from the real issue. Inflaming the professoriate further with this sort of PR stunt in the THE is not well-judged management. She must think she is operating in Belarus¡ªthe UK operates differently¡ªyou have to have the ability to listen and reflect and be able to change paths when you are clearly on the wrong path. Not being able to keep any staff on side let alone the majority of staff and students is end game in this business. I¡¯ve seen the 30 page open letter by hundreds of DMU students to the VC, she must be glad that letter has not leaked to the press. It is the most disapproving and heartfelt letter I¡¯ve seen from students¡ªmany from very disadvantaged backgrounds who are questioning their tuition fees being pumped into the great White Elephant called the Dubai Campus and the ?8000 business class flights for the top team to fly back and forward for a look--cough cough.
<ÍøÆØÃÅ class="pane-title"> Sponsored
<ÍøÆØÃÅ class="pane-title"> Featured jobs
See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT